147
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Safety and effectiveness of different dosage of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

, , , , , & show all
Pages 115-124 | Published online: 19 Mar 2013
 

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and improvement in quality of life using 10 mg and 5 mg daily doses of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids.

Design

The research was a randomized double-blind clinical study undertaken at the Eusebio Hernández Hospital in Havana, Cuba.

Subjects and methods

Seventy subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroids took one daily capsule of 10 mg or 5 mg mifepristone orally for 9 months. One to three endometrial biopsies were performed. In evaluating safety, the variables studied were endometrial changes associated with mifepristone, elevation of hepatic transaminases, side effects of mifepristone, and instances and duration of irregular bleeding.

Results

There were 30/49 (61.2%) and 13/24 (54.2%) diagnoses of endometrial changes associated with mifepristone in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.282). At every evaluation visit the average endometrial thickness was significantly greater in the 10 mg group than in the 5 mg group (P = 0.013, P = 0.002, and P = 0.013, respectively). Only five subjects had slight elevations in their hepatic transaminases after 9 months’ treatment. Sixteen of 35 (45.7%) and eight of 33 (24.2%) subjects had the occasional hot flush in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.032). In total, there were 12.9 ± 4.6 (n = 21) and 9.1 ± 3.9 (n = 18) days of irregular bleeding in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.009).

Conclusion

According to the study findings, a 5 mg daily dose over 9 months has a relatively better safety profile than the 10 mg dose.

Disclosure

We would like to thank Laboratories Litaphar, S.A. for the free supplies of the mifepristone used in this clinical trial and also for their support. The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.