Abstract
Objective
To explore the perspectives of abortion service users regarding termination methods and abortion service delivery in Vietnam.
Materials and methods
Structured exit interviews were conducted between August and November 2011 with women who underwent termination of pregnancy at 62 public health facilities in Hanoi, Khanh Hoa, and Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam. All women presenting for termination during the study period were recruited to participate in the study. Following their abortion, women were asked about their perspectives on abortion service delivery and attributes of medical abortion (MA) versus manual vacuum aspiration (MVA). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between current method uptake and each attribute.
Results
A total of 1,233 women were included in the survey: 541 (43.9%) from Hanoi, 163 (13.2%) from Khanh Hoa, and 529 (42.9%) from Ho Chi Minh: 23.1% underwent MA; 78.9% reported that women should be given a choice between MA and MVA; and 77.6% thought that abortion services were accessible. Among the 48% who responded, 30.1% thought that MA should be made available at primary/secondary health care facilities. Among women who had previously undergone both methods, women who reported that MA “feels more natural” (like a menstrual regulation/period) were more likely to choose MA for their current abortion (odds ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.26–3.69).
Conclusion
MA uptake is significantly lower than MVA uptake. Further insights to women’s perceptions of MA in Vietnam could help improve abortion service delivery in the country.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Departments of Health in Hanoi, Khanh Hoa, and Ho Chi Minh City for their support with this study. Marie Stopes International provided funding for the study.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.