146
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Relationship between social and cognitive functions in people with schizophrenia

, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 2215-2224 | Published online: 30 Aug 2018
 

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to examine clinical factors related to social function in people with schizophrenia.

Patients and methods

The participants were 55 stabilized outpatients with schizophrenia. Their mean age was 39.36 (SD =10.65) years. Social function was assessed using the Quality of Life Scale (QLS). Cognitive function was evaluated with the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Clinical symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale.

Results

Neither the MCCB cognitive domain score nor composite score was correlated with the QLS scores. However, of the 10 MCCB subtests, the Trail Making Test Part A and the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia-Symbol Coding (BACS-SC) scores were positively correlated with the QLS scores. Among clinical variables, especially the PANSS negative syndrome scale score had a strong negative correlation with the QLS scores. Stepwise regression analyses showed that the PANSS negative syndrome scale score was an independent predictor of the QLS scores, and although the BACS-SC score predicted the QLS common objects and activities subscale score, the association was not so strong compared to the PANSS negative syndrome scale score.

Conclusion

These results indicate that speed of processing evaluated by BACS-SC could predict some aspect of social function but negative symptoms have a much stronger impact on global social function in people with schizophrenia.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ms Mai Doi, Ms Atsuko Watanabe, Ms Ayako Kamitani, and Ms Ayano Arai for their help with cognitive assessment.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.