Prognostic Factors and Construction of Nomogram Prediction Model of Lung Cancer Patients Using Clinical and Blood Laboratory Parameters

Abstract

Objective

This work aimed to explore the prognostic risk factors of lung cancer (LC) patients and establish a line chart prediction model.

Methods

A total of 322 LC patients were taken as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a training set (n = 202) and a validation set (n = 120). Basic information and laboratory indicators were collected, and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were followed up. Single-factor and cyclooxygenase (COX) multivariate analyses were performed on the training set to construct a Nomogram prediction model, which was validated with 120 patients in the validation set, and Harrell’s consistency was analyzed.

Results

Single-factor analysis revealed significant differences in PFS (P<0.05) between genders, body mass index (BMI), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), treatment methods, treatment response evaluation, smoking status, presence of pericardial effusion, and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) at 0 and 1–50%. Significant differences in OS (P<0.05) were observed for age, tumor location, treatment methods, White blood cells (WBC), uric acid (UA), CA125, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), SCCA, cytokeratin fragment 21 (CYFRA21), and smoking status. COX analysis identified male gender, progressive disease (PD) as treatment response, and SCCA > 1.6 as risk factors for LC PFS. The consistency indices of the line chart models for predicting PFS and OS were 0.782 and 0.772, respectively.

Conclusion

Male gender, treatment response of PD, and SCCA > 1.6 are independent risk factors affecting the survival of LC patients. The PFS line chart model demonstrates good concordance.

Keywords:

• laboratory parameters
• LC
• nomogram prediction model
• KM analysis
• cox multivariate analysis

Acknowledgment

Jie Cui and Jinpeng Liu should be regard as co-corresponding authors for this study. We want to especially acknowledge all the participants in this study.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by Xi’an Science and Technology Plan Project (Grant NO.21YXYJ0128), Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital-level topic (Grant NO:2021QN002).