Abstract
Purpose
Medical insurance is a disease risk-sharing mechanism that can improve residents’ financial access to medical treatment and thus increase their utilization of health services. This paper aims to identify the impact of different kinds of medical insurances on the use of healthcare for Chinese mid-aged and older urban residents from four aspects: outpatient behaviour, outpatient costs, inpatient behaviour and inpatient costs.
Materials and Methods
The data used in this study were from 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) conducted by Peking University. Binary logit model and multiple linear regression model were used to analyse the impact of health insurance on the use of healthcare, and the PSM method was used to test the robustness of the results.
Results
Participating in either BMIUSE or BMISURR can significantly improve all kinds of healthcare utilization for mid-aged and older urban groups. However, there are huge differences on the healthcare utilization between BMISUE and BMISURR. Specifically, the probability of using inpatient care and inpatient costs of urban residents enrolled in the BMISUE are 4.2% and 45% higher, respectively, than those covered by the BMISURR, but there are no differences in outpatient care utilization and outpatient costs between these two health insurance programs.
Conclusion
This paper suggests that the large gaps between BMISUE and BMISURR only reflect on inpatient care and inpatient costs, there is no difference in outpatient services between these two health insurance programs. “Excessive demand”, “induced demand” and other moral hazard phenomena in BMISUE should be avoided when receiving hospitalization services.
Abbreviations
BMISUE, the Basic Medical Insurance System for Urban Employees; BMISURR, the Basic Medical Insurance System for Urban and Rural Residents; PSM, the propensity score matching; CHARLS, China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study; NRCMS, the Chinese government set up the New Rural Cooperative Medical System; BMISUR, the Basic Medical Insurance System for Urban Residents.
Ethics Approval
Ethical approval for this study and written informed consent from the participants of the study were not required as per national legislation and institutional requirements.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.