46
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PREGNANCY

Effects of knowledge, education, and experience on acceptance of first trimester screening for chromosomal anomalies

, , , &
Pages 931-938 | Received 15 Jul 2009, Accepted 08 Feb 2010, Published online: 17 Mar 2010
 

Abstract

Objectives. To assess pregnant women's knowledge and understanding of first trimester prenatal screening (nuchal translucency, maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy-associated plasma-protein-A), to evaluate the impact of a new information booklet and investigate the effects of education and experiential knowledge of congenital disabilities on the perceived likelihood of accepting prenatal screening. Design. A quasi-experimental quantitative study with a self-completion questionnaire. Setting. Five different maternity care clinics in Iceland. Population. Expectant mothers in first trimester of pregnancy (n = 379). Material and methods. Expectant mothers were divided into two groups, an intervention and a control group, both receiving traditional care and information. The intervention group additionally received an information booklet about prenatal screening and diagnosis. Main outcome measures. Women's knowledge score of prenatal screening. The correlation between education, knowledge score, experiential knowledge of congenital disabilities, and the likelihood of accepting prenatal screening. Results. More than half of the women (57%) believed they received sufficient information to make an informed decision about screening. Knowledge scores were significantly higher for the intervention group (with mean 4.8 compared with 3.7 on a 0–8 scale, p < 0.0001). Those with higher scores were more likely to accept screening (p < 0.0001). Women with experiential knowledge of congenital anomalies in their own families were more likely to accept prenatal screening (p = 0.017). Conclusions. Various factors, e.g. experiential knowledge, education and information about prenatal screening affect the likelihood of participation in prenatal screening programs. More information results in better knowledge and higher uptake rate.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank midwifes and other staff at the five clinics and the Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine at Landspitali University Hospital for their valuable assistance and the health care professionals grading the free text answers.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.