253
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Factors that explain the poorer mental health of caregivers: Results from a community survey of older Australians

, , , &
Pages 616-624 | Received 07 Sep 2009, Accepted 22 Dec 2009, Published online: 21 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

Objectives: To contrast the level of anxiety and depression reported by older Australians providing assistance to someone who is ill, disabled or elderly with that of non-caregivers; and to identify secondary stressors and mediating factors which explain caregivers’ poorer mental health.

Method: Analysis of data from wave 2 of the PATH Through Life Study, a community survey of 2,222 adults aged 64–69 years conducted in Canberra and Queanbeyan, Australia. Mental health was assessed using the Goldberg depression and anxiety scales. Analyses focused on those who identified themselves as a primary carer and/or reported providing care for more than 5 hours per week. Analyses evaluated whether the association between caregiver status and mental health was mediated by financial factors, role strain, physical health, and social support and conflict with family and friends after adjusting for demographics.

Results: Caregivers reported significantly poorer mental health than non-caregivers, and also reported poorer physical health, greater financial stress, greater responsibility for household tasks, and more conflict and less social support from their family and spouse. Mediation analysis showed that the poorer mental health of caregivers reflected elevated rates of their own physical impairment, a lack of social support and greater conflict.

Conclusions: The relationship between caregiving and mental health was largely explained by social support and levels of conflict within the family, which are modifiable and potentially amenable to change through policy and intervention. Research such as this can assist the development of appropriate interventions to improve the circumstances of informal caregivers in Australia.

Acknowledgements

Funding for data collection was provided by by NHMRC Program Grant 179805 and NHMRC Project Grant 157125. Financial support for this project was received from the Australian Government Department of Families, Community Services, and Indigenous Affairs through the Social Policy Research Services Contract. Butterworth, Rodgers and Anstey are funded by NHMRC Fellowships #366781, #148948 and #366756 respectively. Windsor is supported by NHMRC Capacity Building Grant in Population Health Research No. 418020. We wish to thank Helen Christensen, Anthony Jorm, Simon Easteal, Trish Jacomb, Karen Maxwell and the team of PATH interviewers for their contribution to the research.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.