![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
Studies using modern imaging techniques suggest that, in developmental stuttering, there is dysfunction within the cortical and subcortical areas of the motor control system wider than that pertaining to speech motor control alone. If this is the case, one might expect motor deficits extending beyond and unrelated to the production of speech in people who stutter. This study explored this proposal by investigating the presence and characteristics of involuntary movements accompanying stuttering. Sixteen adults with developmental stuttering and 16 controls matched for age and sex were audio-videotaped during 5 minutes of conversational speech and reading a passage of 350 words. Audio-data were examined for dysfluencies. Movements of the face, head and upper body considered involuntary and not part of normal facial expression or gesture and not part of the mechanics of speech were identified and described from muted video-data. Subjects who stuttered had a higher proportion of classic (within-word) dysfluencies accompanied by involuntary movements (IMs) than controls during speech (24.4% vs. 4.5%, p=.054) and reading (28.6% vs. 4.9%, p equals;. 033). There was no difference in proportion of classic dysfluencies accompanied by IMs between speech and reading for either group. IMs were also seen in both groups during fluent speech, with a similar incidence during free speech (3.9% vs. 3.0%, NS) but a greater incidence in the subjects who stuttered during reading (2.4% vs. 0.8%, p equals;. 03). In contrast, there was no difference between the two groups for IMs accompanying normal (between-word) dysfluencies. This suggests that classic and normal dysfluency and their accompanying IMs have different etiologies. The notion that stuttering and IMs are due to altered function in a motor control system wider than that of speech motor control alone is supported by a higher incidence of IMs in people who stutter during both classic dysfluencies and fluent speech.