140
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
TECHNICAL NOTE

Influence of carbon monoxide leaks on the measurement error of total haemoglobin mass

, , , , , & show all
Pages 523-528 | Received 17 Jan 2011, Accepted 06 May 2011, Published online: 06 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

Total haemoglobin mass (Hbmass) can be assessed with low measurement error using carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing. However, variability in measurement error of Hbmass has been reported across laboratories and it has previously been suggested that CO leaks contribute to this variability. As a result of employing a standardized leak monitoring procedure using two CO detectors, we were able to retrospectively examine the impact of CO leaks on Hbmass values from past test-retest studies in our laboratory using the optimized CO rebreathing method. Test-retest data were collected to determine measurement error, with subjects tested twice within 5 days. Test-retest data were placed into separate categories based on magnitude and duration of CO leak observed during one of the two tests. The No Leak category contained test-retest data in which no leak occurred during either test. The Minor Leak category contained test-retest data in which one of the tests had a CO leak of magnitude less than 30 ppm and less than 5 seconds duration, whereas the Major Leak category included test-retest data in which a leak greater than this magnitude or duration occurred. Measurement error was lowest in the No Leak category (1.9%; 95%CI: 1.6–2.3%; n = 56), approximately doubled in the Minor Leaks category (3.6%; 95%CI: 2.6–6.1%; n = 13), and dramatically increased in the Major Leaks category (9.3%; 95%CI: 6.3–17.6%; n = 10). We recommend careful monitoring of potential CO leaks using multiple detectors. To minimize measurement error, tests in which any CO leak is detected should be excluded.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a HQ AF/SGR grant and a USAF Academy Life Sciences Research Center grant. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.