282
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Esophagus

Long-term complications to reflux disease in community practice. A 17-year cohort study of 4706 patients

, , , &
Pages 1179-1186 | Received 18 Mar 2011, Accepted 26 May 2011, Published online: 27 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

Objective. To examine the risk of developing strictures in patients with erosive and non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in a community-based setting, since controlled trials indicate that the use of proton pump inhibitors renders the risk of strictures insignificant. Material and methods. A 17-year cohort study of 4706 patients referred to endoscopy due to upper GI symptoms, with a population comparison cohort of 47,060 individuals. All patients were followed and treated according to prevailing guidelines by their usual care provider. Main outcomes were relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incident strictures and dilatations. Results. 776 (16.5%) patients were diagnosed with erosive esophagitis, particularly men (61.2%). Over a period of 1–17 years (mean 10.5), 20 patients (2.6%) in the esophagitis group developed a peptic stricture, necessitating one or more dilatations in 16 patients (2.1%). Among the non-esophagitis patients, the incidences for both outcomes were 1.2%. Male gender doubled the risk of developing strictures, and alcohol abuse raised the risk four folds. Erosive patients had a risk of developing strictures eight times (95% CI: 5.0–13.0) higher than controls, whereas non-erosive patients' risk was 4.0 (95% CI: 2.8–5.7). The majority of strictures developed within the first 10 years after a diagnosis of esophagitis. Conclusion. Patients with esophagitis had eight times higher risk of strictures than population controls and two times higher than dyspeptic patients without esophagitis. This indicates that long-term outcomes in general practice are poorer than in controlled trials, most likely due to a lack of compliance with medication.

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted with financial support from Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.