291
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Esophagus

Impedance baseline and reflux perception in responder and non-responder non-erosive reflux disease patients

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1266-1273 | Received 11 Jun 2012, Accepted 13 Aug 2012, Published online: 07 Sep 2012
 

Abstract

Background. It was recently shown that GERD patients have lower impedance baseline (IB) values than healthy controls and, that the esophageal acid exposure time (AET) correlates with IB levels. Goals. To explore the sensitivity of IB measurements in NERD patients, responders and non-responders to PPIs, when compared with pH-impedance (MII-pH) variables, and to evaluate whether this variable could represent a marker of GERD symptoms. Reproducibility and inter-observer agreement of IB measurement were also assessed. Study. MII-pH tracings from 44 NERD responders and 22 non-responders were analysed. Ten healthy volunteers underwent the same protocol. IB values were measured at the distal and proximal esophagus. IB was also analysed in a subgroup of patients and in controls with two methods and by two blinded operators. Results. Mean IB values at the distal esophagus were significantly lower in NERD patients than in controls. IB values did not differ between responders and non-responders. Of the 8 responders with negative AET and symptom association probability (SAP), 3 (37.5%) showed IB values lower than controls. IB values in responders with positive and negative SAP were similar (1832 (1596–2068) Ω vs 1667 (1361–1973) Ω, p: n.s.). No differences were found between the IB values measured with the two methods and the inter-observer agreement was good. Conclusions. IB is a promising and easy to calculate MII-pH variable and appears to increase the sensitivity of MII-pH monitoring. IB values cannot predict PPI response and are not associated with reflux perception in NERD patients.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Mrs Marian Shields for help with English style.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.