Abstract
Background. Various treatment modalities are currently being used in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, long-term outcome is not clear. The aim is to evaluate long-term results of GERD treatments with regard to reflux symptoms, use of anti-reflux medication and anti-reflux surgery outcome. Methods. Patients who had undergone 24-h pH monitoring for reflux symptoms between January 2002 and March 2012 were invited to fill out the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and a general questionnaire. Patients with and without anti-reflux surgery were compared using multiple linear and logistic regression models. Results. In total, 1027 of 2190 included patients (47%) returned the questionnaires. After exclusion due to predefined criteria, 477 patients were analyzed. Median total RDQ score was 18 points (10.2% symptom-free) in the conservative group (n = 304) and 10 points (31.2% symptom-free) in the surgical group (n = 173) after a mean follow up of 5.1 years. Daily proton pomp inhibitor (PPI) use was higher in the conservative group than in the surgical group (80.9% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.000). Linear regression analysis showed an association between RDQ scores and anti-reflux surgery (β = −5.477, p = 0.001) and male gender (β = −4.306, p = 0.006). Logistic regression analyses showed that daily PPI use was lower in patients who underwent anti-reflux surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.24, p = 0.000), while it increased with age (OR = 1.03, p = 0.000). Conclusions. There is still a high prevalence of typical reflux symptoms and daily PPI use in GERD patients after >5 years of follow up. Male patients and patients who had undergone anti-reflux surgery were more often asymptomatic. Daily PPI use was lower after anti-reflux surgery, while it increased with age.
Acknowledgments
Author contribution: S. Van Meer, A. Bogte and P. D. Siersema were responsible for study concept and design, revision and drafting the paper, analysis and interpretation of data and statistical analysis. S. Van Meer was responsible for acquisition of data and had access to all of the data and has takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the analysis. She is the guarantor of the article. Financial support: SM and AB have no funding interests to declare. PS has served as a consultant to Janssen–Cilag and has received unrestricted grants from AstraZeneca, Nycomed and Janssen–Cilag, The Netherlands. The sponsors did not have a role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the paper.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.