371
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Endoscopy

Argon plasma coagulation in the right and left colon: safety–risk profile of the 60W–1.2 l/min setting

&
Pages 632-641 | Received 30 Jan 2014, Accepted 09 Mar 2014, Published online: 02 Apr 2014
 

Abstract

Background and study aim. The 40W–0.8 l/min setting is widely recommended for argon plasma coagulation (APC) in the right colon. Until March 2012, we used the 60W–1.2 l/min setting for all sites of the colon. By auditing our experience, we assessed the safety–risk profile of the 60W–1.2 l/min setting in the right and left colon. Patients and methods. All cases treated with APC by a single endoscopist, using the 60W–1.2 l/min setting for all sites of the colon between October 2001 and December 2007 were identified retrospectively and site, type, number of lesions, and complications were recorded. Between January 2008 and March 2012, information was recorded prospectively. Results. In the retrospective audit, 290 lesions (101 cecum/ascending, 120 sigmoid/descending, 69 transverse) were treated in 241 patient endoscopies. There were no perforations. In the prospective audit, 156 lesions (83 cecum/ascending, 47 sigmoid/descending, 26 transverse) were treated in 132 patient endoscopies. There was 1/83 (1.2%) perforation in the cecum/ascending colon and none in the transverse or sigmoid/descending (n.s.). Combined, the results yield a cecal/ascending perforation rate of 1/153 (0.6%) patient endoscopies, 1/184 (0.5%) lesions treated and overall perforation rate for all sites of the colon of 1/373 (0.3%) patient endoscopies and 1/446 (0.2%) lesions. Post-polypectomy syndrome and delayed bleeding each occurred in 3/373 (0.8%) patient endoscopies and 3/446 (0.7%) lesions. There were no deaths. Conclusion. In the cecum and ascending colon, the APC perforation rate at the 60W–1.2 l/min setting was no higher than in the left colon and is similar to that reported in previously published series. Therefore, it appears safe, provided the precautions we describe are strictly followed.

Acknowledgments

Study conception and design: Dr M Z Panos and Dr A Koumi equally. Acquisition of data: Dr M Z Panos and Dr A Koumi equally. Analysis and interpretation of data: Dr M Z Panos and Dr A Koumi equally. Writing manuscript: Dr M Z Panos and Dr A Koumi equally.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.