8
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Endoscopic Treatment and Restrictive Surgical Policy in the Management of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: Five Years' Experience in a Central Hospital

, , &
Pages 569-576 | Received 13 Aug 1993, Accepted 08 Nov 1993, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Qvist P, Arnesen KE, Jacobsen CD, Rosseland AR. Endoscopic treatment and restrictive surgical policy in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding. Five years' experience in a central hospital. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994;29:569-576.

Background: Despite improved surgical and endoscopic technics, acute bleeding from peptic ulcer is still a serious condition, and management remains controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate a management policy of aggressive endoscopic and restrictive surgical treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated the course of all 341 hospital admissions during 1986 to 1990 caused by bleeding peptic ulceration from the first bleeding episode until 30 days after discharge. Results: Total mortality, in-hospital 30 days' mortality, and operative mortality were 6.3%, 4.4%, and 23.5%, respectively. Risk factors associated with mortality were age and number of concomitant diseases, malignant disease, rebleeding episodes, and surgical complications. No patients without associated illness died. In 73 cases (21%) patients were treated endoscopically one or more times, and altogether 17 patients (5%) were operated on. Rebleeding occurred in 67 cases (23%), and only 23 of these were treated endoscopically at admission. Twenty-six (51%) of the rebleeding patients were treated endoscopically and 13 rebleeding patients were operated on. Two-thirds of patients presenting with arterial bleeding were managed endoscopically. No complications occurred in endoscopically treated patients, whereas there were complications in 8 of 17 operated patients. Operated patients needed significantly more intensive care unit observation time and had longer hospital stay than patients treated endoscopically.

Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment is a safe procedure with a low mortality, and, if successful, the need for emergency surgery is substantially reduced. In the relatively few patients requiring surgery after unsuccessful endoscopy, the mortality remains high.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.