252
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Combinations of urine-based tumour markers in bladder cancer surveillance

, , , , &
Pages 461-466 | Received 31 May 2009, Accepted 25 Aug 2009, Published online: 10 Nov 2009
 

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the study was to investigate whether combinations of urine-based tumour markers including urinary cytology (Cytology or Cyt) increase the sensitivity in the detection of bladder cancer recurrence. Material and methods. Urinary cytology, NMP22, UroVysion (FISH) and ImmunoCyt™ (uCyt+) were determined in 221 patients during the follow-up of non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma (NMI TCC) before cystoscopy (n = 49) or with the suspicion of TCC recurrence before transurethral resection of the bladder (n = 173). For all markers alone as well as in all possible combinations (multimarker panels, MPs) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were evaluated. MPs were considered positive if at least one marker was positive. Results. No malignancy was found in 108 patients, whereas recurrent TCC was confirmed in 113 patients. Sensitivity and specificity for Cytology were 84% and 62%, for NMP22 68% and 49%, for FISH 72% and 63%, and for uCyt+ 73% and 62%, respectively. The NPV was below 80% for all markers alone. Combinations of two and three markers increased the sensitivity as well as the NPV to over 90 and 80%, by reducing specificity to an average of 44% and 35%, respectively. The most sensitive combinations were NMP22, uCyt+ together with Cytology and FISH, and uCyt+ together with NMP22 (sensitivity for both combinations 98%). There was no further improvement when all four markers were combined. Conclusions. Combinations of tumour markers increased the sensitivity and NPV in the detection of recurrence of NMI TCC. A stepwise approach of tumour marker determination may be used to reduce the frequency of follow-up cystoscopies at a reasonable risk.

Declaration of interests: Funding/Support and Sponsoring for this study: None. Conflict of interest: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.