Publication Cover
Xenobiotica
the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems
Volume 42, 2012 - Issue 10
1,025
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Xenobiochemistry

Generation of proliferating human hepatocytes using upcyte® technology: characterisation and applications in induction and cytotoxicity assays

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 939-956 | Received 13 Jan 2012, Accepted 08 Mar 2012, Published online: 24 Apr 2012
 

Abstract

  1. We have developed a novel technique which causes primary human hepatocytes to proliferate by transducing them with genes that upregulate their proliferation.

  2. Upcyte® hepatocytes did not form colonies in soft agar and are not immortalised anchorage-independent cells. Confluent cultures expressed liver-specific proteins, produced urea and stored glycogen.

  3. CYP activities were low but similar to that in 5-day cultures of primary human hepatocytes. CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 were inducible; moreover, upcyte® hepatocytes predicted the in vivo induction potencies of known CYP3A4 inducers using the “relative induction score” prediction model. Placing cells into 3D culture increased their basal CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 basal activities and induction responses.

  4. Phase 2 activities (UGTs, SULTs and GSTs) were comparable to activities in freshly isolated hepatocytes.

  5. Upcyte® hepatocytes were markedly more sensitive to the hepatotoxin, α-amanitin, than HepG2 cells, indicating functional OATP1B3 uptake. The cytotoxicity of aflatoxin B1, was decreased in upcyte® hepatocytes by co-incubation with the CYP3A4 inhibitor, ketoconazole. Upcyte® hepatocytes also differentiated between ten hepatotoxic and eight non-hepatotoxic compounds.

  6. In conclusion, upcyte® hepatocyte cultures have a differentiated phenotype and exhibit functional phase 1 and 2 activities. These data support the use of upcyte® hepatocytes for CYP induction and cytotoxicity screening.

Notice of Correction

The version of this article published online ahead of print on 24th April 2012 contained an error on page 9. The first sentence of the legend for should have read ‘Values are expressed as pmol·min−1·mg−1 cellular protein apart from GST activity, which is expressed as nmol.h−1·mg−1 protein’ (originally min−1 was incorrectly displayed as h−1). The error has been corrected for this version.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.