55
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Gynaecology

Anaesthesia for incontinence surgery: Spinal anaesthesia or sedation?

, &
Pages 605-608 | Published online: 11 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

This was a patient and assessor blinded randomised controlled trial to compare the patient and surgeon's satisfaction for retropubic tapes inserted under sedation vs spinal anaesthesia and also looking at the bladder sensation following insertion of the tape. A total of 38 patients completed the study (19 in each group). The differences in mean visual analogue scores were in favour of spinal anaesthesia. The surgeon's assessment of patient cooperation was 24.2, 95% CI 9.6–38.8 p = 0.002, while for pain, the difference in the mean scores was –21.6, 95% CI –36.6 to –6.5, p = 0.006. The difference in the mean scores for the feeling of being in control was 21.4, 95% CI 0.85 to 41.63, p = 0.004. The only significant difference in bladder sensation postoperatively was the strong desire to void at 1 hour. This study demonstrates that spinal anaesthesia has better patient and surgeon satisfaction, with a difference in bladder sensation at 1 hour postoperatively.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.