Publication Cover
Orbit
The International Journal on Orbital Disorders, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery
Volume 33, 2014 - Issue 1
451
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Dermis Fat Grafts as Primary and Secondary Orbital Implants

, , &
Pages 33-38 | Received 14 May 2013, Accepted 09 Sep 2013, Published online: 06 Nov 2013
 

Abstract

Introduction: This study was performed to evaluate the outcome after autologous dermis-fat graft [DFG] orbital implants in a large sample.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of all primary and secondary DFGs in a 16-year period was done. Aesthetic and functional results, patients’ satisfaction and postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results: In total 468 DFGs were performed in the study period (315 primary [I°] and 153 secondary [II°] DGFs). In the analysis, 173 DFG I° and 66 DFG II° were included as sufficient follow-up was available. Median follow-up after DFG I° was 21.5 months and 14 months after DFG II°. After DFG I°, in 76% of patients motility of the graft was possible in all directions; 81% had good fitting of the prosthesis and 83% were highly satisfied with the results. Mean width of palpebral apertures was 0.2 mm smaller and Hertel exophthalmometry revealed a mean enophthalmus of 1.6 mm on the operated side compared to the fellow-eye. After DFG II°, motility was possible in all directions in 34% of patients. Fitting of the prosthesis was good/reasonable in 49%/41% and patients were highly satisfied in 57%. On average, on the operated side palpebral apertures were 0.6 mm smaller and Hertel measurements showed an enophthalmus of 2.6 mm. Major complications were uncommon. Complete necrosis of the implant was more often observed after II° (6.1%) than after I° DFG (3.5%).

Discussion: In this large sample, DFG proved to be an effective and safe method for the reconstruction of anophthalmic sockets.

Acknowledgements

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (E.S.O.P.R.S.), September 2005, Crete, Greece.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.