![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Aim: A web-based anonymous survey was performed to evaluate practice preferences in the management of Graves’ orbitopathy amongst oculofacial surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region.
Methods: A questionnaire with contentious topics in Graves’ orbitopathy was sent out via email to oculofacial surgeons in 14 countries within Asia-Pacific between May to December 2012.
Results: A response rate of 25.2% to 34.6% was achieved (32–44 of 127 participants). 61.0% of respondents encountered Graves’ orbitopathy commonly in their practice. The more common causes of vision loss in Graves’ orbitopathy included dysthyroid optic neuropathy (67.5%) and exposure keratopathy (15.0%). The clinical activity score was the most popular grading system for assessing Graves’ orbitopathy. The preferred non-surgical therapeutic approaches included intravenous pulsed methylprednisolone (79.5%), oral steroids (56.4%), orbital radiation (12.8%), steroid-sparing immunosuppressants (10.3%) and watchful observation (7.7%). Thyroid orbital decompression was uncommonly or rarely performed by respondents. Orbital surgical decompression was most commonly performed via the two-wall technique (73.5%) and most respondents performed fat decompression (69.4%). Post-operatively, the most common complications include under correction (45.5%) and diplopia (42.4%).
Conclusion: We report the results of the first survey on the management of Graves’ orbitopathy amongst oculofacial surgeons in Asia-Pacific. Our respondents practice preferences reflected the Graves’ orbitopathy management consensus statement by the European group on Graves’ orbitopathy in 2008.