Two strategies for the acute response to cold exposure but one strategy for the response to heat stress

Abstract

Purpose: The main aim of this study was to compare physiological and psychological reactions to heat stress between people who exhibited fast cooling (FC, n = 20) or slow cooling (SC; n = 20) responses to 14 °C cold water immersion. Methods: Forty healthy young men (19–25 years old) were recruited to this study based on their tolerance to cold exposure (FC versus SC). The heat stress was induced using immersion in bath water at 43–44 °C. Motor and cognitive performance, immune variables, markers of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity (i.e. stress hormone concentrations), and autonomic nervous system activity were monitored. Results: In the FC group, time to warm the body from a resting rectal temperature (T_re) of 37.1 ± 0.2 °C before warming to 39.5 °C was 63.7 ± 22.4 min. In the SC group, the time to warm the body from a T_re 37.1 ± 0.3 °C before warming to 39.5 °C was 67.2 ± 13.8 min (p > 0.05 between groups). The physiological stress index (PSI) after warming was 8.0 ± 0.6 and 8.2 ± 1.0 in the FC and SC groups, respectively (p > 0.05 between groups). During warming, the changes in subjective indicators of heat stress did not differ significantly between the FC (7.4 ± 0.5) and SC (7.1 ± 1.1) groups, respectively. Conclusion: The increase in cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and corticosterone concentrations after passive body heating did not differ between the FC and SC groups. Heat stress did not change indicators of innate and specific immunity in the FC or the SC group. An interesting finding was that heat stress did not affect motor and cognitive function in either group, although central fatigue during 1-min maximal voluntary contraction increased after heat stress in both groups.

• Cold adaptation strategies
• heat stress
• immune system
• motor and cognitive performance
• stress indicators

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Danute Juciene for blood sample collection.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.