486
Views
53
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Standard intracranial in vivo animal models of delayed cerebral vasospasm

, &
Pages 415-434 | Received 17 Jun 2009, Accepted 02 Mar 2010, Published online: 20 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

Object. Animal models provide a basis for clarifying the complex pathogenesis of delayed cerebral vasospasm (DCVS) and for screening of potential therapeutic approaches. Arbitrary use of experimental parameters in current models can lead to results of uncertain relevance. The aim of this work was to identify and analyze the most consistent and feasible models and their parameters for each animal.

Methods. An online search of the MEDLINE PubMed and EMBASE medical databases (1969 to week 21 of 2007) was performed using the key words “canine”, “mice”, “rabbit”, “pig”, “rat”, “cat”, and “primate” in combination with “subarachnoid hemorrhage”, “model”, and “vasospasm”. Cross references of each model were checked. Analysis of identified publications was considered in accordance with predetermined eligibility criteria.

Results. 1254 abstracts were reviewed and 516 studies were included in the analysis. Then, 66 models in 7 animals were identified. Most often used blood amounts (ml) lead to degree (% vessel narrowing) and peak onset (day) of DCVS within animal models as follows: mice endovascular puncture (various, day 3, 20–62%); rat single injection (0.3 ml, day 2, 19–29%); rat double injection (2x0.3 ml, day 7, 28–47%); rabbit single injection (3 ml, day 3, 19–55%); rabbit double injection (not established, day 5, not established); dog double injection (2x4–5 ml, day 7, 45–66%); primate clot placement (5 ml, day 7, 32–52%).

Conclusions. Among the great number of experimental SAH methods and associated parameters only a fistful reliable and consistent models can be identified and recommended. Implementation of more standardized experimental techniques could increase the relevance of future experimental studies.

Acknowledgments

This review would not have been possible without the support of the Rockefeller Medical Library, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK. We acknowledge their professional assistance in screening all sources of literature.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. No funds were or will be received for this study. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.