155
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Extensive basal ganglia hematomas treated by local thrombolysis versus conservative management – a comparative retrospective analysis

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 401-406 | Received 28 Dec 2014, Accepted 21 Feb 2016, Published online: 23 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Objectives: Single-target puncture plus catheter insertion into the clot is a routine step in hematoma aspiration and local thrombolysis for spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). However, multiple-target puncture of this procedure may imply faster hematoma reduction for large-area ICH. We retrospectively examined the outcomes after clot aspiration plus local thrombolysis with single-/double-target and conservative therapy for extensive basal ganglic hematomas. Methods: A case note review was conducted on a consecutive series of ICH patients in a single centre with huge basal ganglia hematomas who underwent clots aspiration and thrombolysis or pure medical therapy. We analysed the clinical presentation, radiological features and treatment outcomes of ICH patients in single-target group, double-target group and conservative group. Results: A total of 92 ICH cases were included in this study. At the post-treatment assessment, the average level by hematoma size in single-target and double-group was respectively smaller than that in the conservative group (20.61 ml vs. 15.75 ml vs 60.53 ml, p < 0.01). The 30-day case fatality rate in conservative group was respectively significantly higher than that in single-target and double-target groups (50% vs. 14.70% vs. 20.59%, p < 0.01). At the time of 6-month follow-up, the proportion of good survival in conservative group was respectively remarkably less than that in single- and double-target group (29.17% vs.64.71% vs. 67.65%, p < 0.01). But no difference was detected with respect to 30-day mortality or long-time outcome between the two micro-invasive groups (p = 0.53 and 0.798, respectively). Conclusion: Our data suggested for the massive basal ganglia hematomas, clot aspiration and thrombolysis can improve the short- and long-term prognosis compared with the pure conservative therapy. But, no evidence was found to demonstrate double-target of this procedure to be more effective than single-target to improve the outcome.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Funding information

This project was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81171089 and No. 30770751), Key Clinical Program of the Ministry of Health of China (2010), and the Future Program of New Technology and Business in Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China (2012).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.