158
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Sclerotomy Site Leakage According to Wound Shape in 23-Gauge Microincisional Vitrectomy Surgery

, &
Pages 499-504 | Received 23 Apr 2009, Accepted 24 Jan 2010, Published online: 14 May 2010
 

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the shape and self-sealing nature of scleral incision sites according to bevel shape and trocar blade direction in 23-gauge microincisional vitrectomy surgery.

Methods: Twenty-three-gauge microincisional vitrectomies were performed in 60 eyes using a single-step entry system (Alcon Surgical, USA) and a 23-gauge two-step Eckardt vitrectomy system (DORC, the Netherlands). Trocar cannula were inserted using trocar blades bevel-up (20 eyes) or bevel-down (20 eyes). In 20 eyes, trocars were inserted after sclerotomies were performed using a microvitreoretinal (MVR) blade. After removing the cannula, we compared the scleral wound shapes and looked for leakage.

Results: A total of 180 sclerotomies were done: 60 in the bevel-up direction (group 1), 60 in the bevel-down direction (group 2), and 60 using an MVR blade (group 3). Bevel-up insertion produced a V-shaped sclerotomy wound, whereas bevel-down insertion produced a reverse V-shaped wound. The MVR blade produced a slit-shaped wound. Wound leakage was identified in 21 V-shaped wounds, seven reverse V-shaped wounds, and four slit-shaped wounds. We observed no cases of hypotony, vitreous incarceration, or endophthalmitis.

Conclusions: The self-sealing effect of slit-shaped wounds and reverse V-shaped wounds was superior to that of V-shaped wounds.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

No grants or sponsoring organizations have been involved in the work described in this submission. The authors have no proprietary or commercial interests related to the manuscript. It has not been published elsewhere.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.