204
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of Corneal Aberrations After Biaxial Microincision and Microcoaxial Cataract Surgeries: A Prospective Study

, , &
Pages 18-24 | Received 15 Jun 2011, Accepted 08 Sep 2011, Published online: 26 Oct 2011
 

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of biaxial microincision cataract surgery (B-MICS) and microcoaxial cataract surgery (C-MICS) techniques on corneal optical quality.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 40 eyes underwent B-MICS and 40 eyes C-MICS. Corneal aberrations were derived from conversion of the corneal elevation profile into corneal wavefront data with 6.0 mm aperture diameter using Zernike polynomials by corneal topography preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. Both magnitude and axes of surgically induced corneal aberrations were calculated.

Results: Mean final incision widths were 1.80 ± 0.09 mm and 1.89 ± 0.11 mm (p = 0.062) in B-MICS and C-MICS groups, respectively. There were no significant changes in total and higher order root mean square in both groups postoperatively. In B-MICS group, all aberration terms were similar, before and after surgery. However, vertical coma (p = 0.002), vertical trefoil (p < 0.001) and primary trefoil (p = 0.042) significantly increased postoperatively in the C-MICS group. Except surgically induced trefoil (p = 0.047), there was no significant difference in all surgically induced corneal aberrations between groups. The axes of the induced trefoil were found to be mostly related and close to the incision site in both groups which was more prominent in the C-MICS group.

Conclusions: Microincision cataract surgery techniques performed through sub-1.9 mm clear corneal incisions do not generally degrade optical quality of the cornea while only small amount of higher order aberrations seem to be induced with C-MICS technique.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None of the authors has a financial and proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned and there is no public or private support. Presented as free paper at the ASCRS Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA, March 2011. This article has not been published elsewhere and that it has not been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.