402
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The Peterborough Scheme for Community Specialist Optometrists in Glaucoma: Results of 4 Years of a Two-Tiered Community-Based Assessment and Follow-up Service

, , , &
Pages 690-696 | Received 24 Mar 2014, Accepted 18 Aug 2014, Published online: 13 Oct 2014
 

Abstract

Aims: To report on results of an innovative glaucoma shared-care scheme based in Peterborough, UK.

Methods: A retrospective review of all new appointments with 11 community-based specialist optometrists in glaucoma (SOG) was conducted. There are two tiers of SOG, whereby tier 2 SOGs have increased levels of autonomy. All optometrist assessments were reviewed by a consultant ophthalmologist, and levels of agreement were calculated for assessment of optic nerve head appearance, Humphrey visual field test interpretation, diagnosis and outcome.

Results: 1639 new patients were assessed by SOGs over a 4-year period. The median waiting time for patients from referral to SOG assessment was 0 days (IQR 0–56), and from SOG assessment to consultant review in a virtual clinic was 12 days (IQR 8–18days). After first appointment, over 60% of patients were classified as low-risk and remained within the SOG scheme. Rates of frank disagreement between SOG and consultant regarding diagnosis and proposed outcome were 5.6 and 10.4%, respectively, for tier 2 SOGs and 15.3 and 28.6%, respectively, for tier 1 SOGs.

Conclusions: The SOG scheme demonstrates acceptable levels of accuracy between SOG and glaucoma consultant. This scheme allows many stable low-risk patients to remain out of hospital eye department outpatient clinics.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The authors declare that no commercial relationships exist in the form of financial support or personal financial interest. The authors declare that they received no funding in the process of completing this research. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.