449
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Surgical Treatment of Dysthyroid Optic Neuropathy: Long-Term Visual Outcomes with Comparison of 2-Wall versus 3-Wall Orbital Decompression

&
Pages 159-164 | Received 26 Aug 2014, Accepted 11 Jan 2015, Published online: 02 Apr 2015
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare the long-term visual outcomes after 2-wall (medial-lateral) versus 3-wall (medial-lateral-inferior) orbital decompression combined with fat removal in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON).

Methods: Records of 68 eyes of 42 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Two-and 3-wall decompression was performed in 41 and 27 eyes, respectively. Transcaruncular approach was used for medial wall decompression. Lateral canthotomy combined with upper eyelid crease incision was used for lateral wall removal, and combined with transconjunctival lower eyelid incision if floor decompression performed. Outcome measures were visual acuity (VA), color vision, Hertel measures, visual field mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD)

Result: The mean follow-up time was 39.3 months (range, 12–72 months). All indicators of visual function significantly improved after 2-and 3-wall decompression. The improvement in VA and color vision was similar between groups. (logMAR VA: 2-wall: 0.52 ± 0.68 versus 3-wall: 0.71 ± 0.86, p = 0.335); (color vision on Ishihara plates: 2-wall: 10.1 ± 8.1 versus 3-wall: 11.6 ± 7.8, p = 0.447). The improvement in MD and PSD were higher after 3-wall decompression (MD: 2-wall: 10.0 ± 5.5 versus 3-wall: 14.3 ± 7.5 dB, p = 0.020); (PSD: 2-wall: 3.5 ± 1.9 versus 3-wall: 4.8 ± 3.0 dB, p = 0.045). Proptosis reduction was higher after 3-wall decompression (2-wall: 5.1 ± 1.3 versus 3-wall: 7.2 ± 1.9 mm, p = 0.0001). New onset diplopia was seen 20% and 28.5% of cases in 2-and 3-wall decompression, respectively. No adnexal/orbital complications were seen in 2-wall group, however orbital hematoma (1 case) and persisting eyelid edema (1 case) were encountered in 3-wall group.

Conclusion: Both 2-and 3-wall orbital decompressions are safe and effective for management of visual dysfunction in DON. Although 3-wall decompression provide better improvement in the parameters of visual field analysis and Hertel measures, new onset diplopia, adnexal/orbital complications are more common with this technique.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None of the authors have any kind of financial, commercial or proprietary interest in any method or material mentioned, directly or indirectly. No public or private support has been received. Preliminary data from this study has been presented at the 29th Congress of European Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in September 15–17th 2011, Italy.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.