640
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Characterizing the severe asthma population in the United States: claims-based analysis of three treatment cohorts in the year prior to treatment escalation

, PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, MBA, , PhD & , PhD
Pages 669-680 | Received 07 May 2014, Accepted 04 Jan 2015, Published online: 03 Mar 2015
 

Abstract

Objectives: Little is known about the disposition of severe patients prior to treatment escalation. To classify patients by treatment step using pharmacy data and describe their economic and healthcare utilization, insurance status, and sociodemographic characteristics in the year prior to escalation to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps 4 and 5. Methods: This was a retrospective claims cohort study of asthma patients (age 12–75 years) newly initiated on “stable therapy” (three consecutive months of therapy) with omalizumab, high intensity corticosteroids (HICS; ≥1000 µg/d inhaled fluticasone equivalent or oral prednisone), or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (HDICS; ≥500–<1000 µg/d fluticasone equivalent) from 2002 to 2011. Other asthma treatments were compared as a reference. Results: Of 25 297 patients, 856 initiated omalizumab, 6926 initiated HICS, and 11 445 initiated HDICS. In the year prior to treatment escalation to omalizumab, HICS, and HDICS, respectively, individuals had high annual mean medical expenditures ($14 071, $12 030, and $7570), utilization (27 outpatient and 10 specialty care visits; 19 outpatient and three specialty; 15 outpatient and two specialty), asthma-related prescription drugs (11.74, 7.8, and 5.17) and chronic comorbidities (2.68, 2.67, and 2.19). Prior to omalizumab treatment, patients were more likely to be salaried, full-time employees with commercial PPO/POS insurance. Conclusions: Prior to escalating treatment to GINA steps 4 and 5, individuals experienced significant annual medical expenditures, healthcare resource utilization and polypharmacy burden, which may reflect poorly controlled asthma and the need to escalate treatment. Medical claims data and utilization-based measures may be helpful in classifying individuals by GINA treatment step.

Acknowledgments

Jon Nilsen PhD (Amgen Inc.) provided medical writing support.

Declaration of interest

Funding was provided by a research grant from Amgen, Inc. Patrick Sullivan reports receiving grants and travel support from Amgen Inc. during the conduct of the study and also reports grants and personal consultancy fees from Amgen Inc., and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim outside of the submitted work. Jonathan Campbell reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen Inc. related to the conduct of this study. Vahram Ghushchyan has nothing to declare. Gary Globe, Jeff Lange, and J. Michael Woolley are employees and stockholders of Amgen Inc.

Supplementary material available online

Supplementary Table 1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.