Assessment of an Ambulatory Care Asthma Program

Abstract

In response to rising asthma morbidity and mortality, numerous comprehensive asthma programs have been developed. However, few studies have examined critically the effectiveness of such programs or the means by which treatment or outcome is altered. To assess the role of a specialized ambulatory asthma care program, we reviewed the interventions recommended to 344 patients referred for the assessment of asthma. A subset of 127 made return visits 6-12 months following their initial assessment, thereby allowing assessment of behavioral and physiological outcomes.

At the initial consultation, the recommended medication changes were: inhaled β-agonists + 6% (p < 0.01), inhaled steroids +58% (p < 0.001), intranasal steroids +8% (p < 0.001), dry powdered formulations +13% (p < 0.01), theophylline - 7% (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients using spacer devices increased 8% (p < 0.001). Comparing preassessment values to those at a visit at 6-12 months following assessment, a further 25% of patients taking inhaled steroids at the initial assessment had a change to either the dose, device, or frequency of administration. Mean FEV₁, improved from 2.41 ± 0.08 liters at the initial assessment to 2.64 ± 0.09 liters at the 6- 12-month visit (p < 0.001). There was an increase in the number of patients considered mild and not obstructed, with a corresponding decrease in the number considered moderately and severely obstructed (p < 0.05). The number of emergency room visits was reduced by more than 60% (p < 0.001) in patients followed for at least 6 months.

We conclude that an ambulatory asthma program marked by increased use of inhaled antiinflammatory medications and decreased use of theophylline can produce significant decreases in asthma exacerbations requiring hospital care, emergency room care, or systemic steroids while reducing the prevalence and severity of airflow limitation.