2,914
Views
65
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Prognostic impact of FOXP3 expression in triple-negative breast cancer

, , , &
Pages 73-81 | Received 09 Aug 2012, Accepted 12 Sep 2012, Published online: 17 Oct 2012
 

Abstract

Background. Forkhead Box Protein 3 (FOXP3) is a marker for immunosuppressive CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). We investigated whether there were significant numbers of FOXP3-positive Tregs in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) using immunohistochemistry, and whether the presence of FOXP3-positive Tregs was associated with other prognostic factors, such as stage or histologic grade. We investigated the number of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive Tregs in formalin-fixed TNBC specimens obtained from patients who received palliative treatment between 1999 and 2007. Material and methods. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the number of CD4+, CD25+, and FOXP3+ Tregs in tumor tissue and normal breast tissue from 86 TNBC patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated outcomes according to the number of FOXP3-positive Tregs. Results. Of the 86 tumor specimens, 22 (25.6%) expressed more than 15 FOXP3-positive Tregs per 10 high power fields in the peritumoral area. On multivariate analysis, staining showing ≥ 15 FOXP3-positive Tregs was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival and progression free survival with hazard ratios of 2.4 (95% CI 1.0–5.6; p = 0.049) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.1–3.6; p = 0.032), respectively. In TNBC, FOXP3-positive Tregs had stronger prognostic significance than did FOXP3-negative Tregs. The finding of improved survival associated with highly infiltrating FOXP3-positive Tregs in TNBC contrasted with several other types of solid cancer. Conclusion. TNBC may be differently driven by FOXP3 via an immune mechanism. The inclusion of FOXP3+ Tregs may help to improve prognostication for TNBC.

Declaration of interest: This study was presented at the 2011 ASCO Annual Meeting as a poster presentation at June 6th 2011, Chicago, Illinois, USA. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.