958
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Identification and characterization of nodal metastases in prostate cancer patients at high risk for lymph node involvement

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1336-1344 | Received 12 May 2012, Accepted 05 Jun 2013, Published online: 23 Jul 2013
 

Abstract

Aim. To investigate whether blood-based markers could be used to identify prostate cancer (PCa) patients harboring lymph node (LN) metastases. In addition, E-cadherin expression was studied within the concept of epithelial mesenchymal plasticity. Material and methods. Seventy-five patients with clinically localized PCa who underwent a superextended lymphadenectomy followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) were included in this study. Preoperative plasma/serum levels of endoglin, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), osteopontin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and E-cadherin were measured using commercially available enzyme immunoassays in 47/75 patients and correlated with clinicopathological parameters. E-cadherin expression in the diagnostic biopsies (n = 63), RP specimens (n = 75) and LN metastases (n = 106) was examined by immunohistochemical analysis. Results. Occult LN metastases were present in almost half of the patients (37/75), with a total of 106 affected LN. Preoperative levels of endoglin, TGF-β1, osteopontin, VEGF, VCAM-1 nor E-cadherin were significantly associated with LN status. Only a positive correlation between plasma endoglin and serum prostate-specific antigen was found (Spearman's r = 0.44; p = 0.002). The majority of biopsies (91.9%) and RP specimens (79.7%) showed strong E-cadherin expression, while in the LN this was found to be much weaker (28.9%). While the staining pattern in the isolated tumor cells (ITC) and micrometastases was mainly homogenous, the macrometastases showed a much more heterogeneous pattern (χ², p < 0.0001). Conclusion. In this study, none of the blood-based markers tested could be used for nodal staging in PCa, nor could E-cadherin expression in the tissue. However, the difference in E-cadherin expression pattern between the ITC/micrometastases and the macrometastases may point to another biological behavior. The specific staining pattern seen in the macrometastases could indicate an ongoing mesenchymal epithelial transition, presumed to be a mechanism for metastatic colonization. As the latter is the rate-limiting step in the metastatic process, evaluation of the E-cadherin expression pattern could have potential therapeutic implications.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

This work was supported through a research grant of the ‘Stichting Emmanuel van der Schueren’ from the Flemish League against Cancer, the IWT – Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders – IWT TBM 060793, and the National Cancer Plan Action 29 (KPC_ 29_037) – Belgium. K.H. is a fundamental clinical researcher of the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO). E.L. and C.M.D. are supported by a grant from the ‘Klinisch Onderzoeksfonds (KOF)’ – University Hospitals Leuven.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.