7,865
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Can dogs smell lung cancer? First study using exhaled breath and urine screening in unselected patients with suspected lung cancer

, , , &
Pages 307-315 | Received 19 Mar 2013, Accepted 10 Jun 2013, Published online: 19 Aug 2013
 

Abstract

Background. On the basis of our own experience and literature search, we hypothesised that a canine olfactory test may be useful for detecting lung cancer in an unselected population of patients suspected to have lung cancer. Material and methods. We conducted a prospective study of 93 patients consecutively admitted to hospital with suspected lung cancer. Exhaled breath and urine were sampled before the patients underwent bronchoscopy. The canine olfactory test was performed in a double-blinded manner. Sensitivity and specificity were outcome measures. Results. With 99% sensitivity, the olfactory test demonstrated that dogs have the ability to distinguish cancer patients from healthy individuals. With an intensified training procedure, the exhaled breath and urine tests showed sensitivity rates of 56–76% and specificity rates of 8.3–33.3%, respectively, in our heterogeneous study population. Conclusion. Although the olfactory test appears to be a promising tool for the detection of cancer, the main challenge is to determine whether the test can sufficiently discriminate between patients at risk, patients with benign disease, and patients with malignant disease. We need to gain a deeper understanding of this test and further refine it before applying it as a screening tool for lung cancer in clinical settings.

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Anne Stine Fossum, Inger Lise Bjerkan, Birgit Pedersen, and Randi Sailer, the nurses at the Department of Thoracic Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, who contributed in the sampling, collection, and storing of bronchoscopy, blood, and urine samples. We also want to thank Siren Thorsvik (mathematician and statistician) for her contribution to the statistical analysis, and the dog handlers and Turid Buvik, Anne Marit Hagen and Mette Olsen at Trondheim School of Dog Behaviour.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

We thank the local cancer foundation, Kreftfondet St. Olavs Hospital, for providing support for the first year of this project.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.