Influence of MRI-based bone outline definition errors on external radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy in heterogeneous pseudo-CT images of prostate cancer patients

Abstract

Background. This work evaluates influences of susceptibility-induced bone outline shift and perturbations, and bone segmentation errors on external radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based pseudo-computed tomography (CT) images of the male pelvis.

Material and methods. T₁/T₂*-weighted fast gradient echo, T₁-weighted spin echo and T₂-weighted fast spin echo images were used in bone detection investigation. Bone edge location and bone diameter in MRI were evaluated by comparing those in the images with actual physical measurements of fresh deer bones positioned in a gelatine phantom. Dose calculation accuracy in pseudo-CT images was investigated for 15 prostate cancer patients. Bone outlines in T₁/T₂*-weighted images were contoured and additional segmentation errors were simulated by expanding and contracting the bone contours with 1 mm spacing. Heterogeneous pseudo-CT images were constructed by adopting a technique transforming the MRI intensity values into Hounsfield units with separate conversion models within and outside of bone segment.

Results. Bone edges and diameter in the phantom were illustrated correctly within a 1 mm-pixel size in MRI. Each 1 mm-sized systematic error in bone segment resulted in roughly 0.4% change to the prostate dose level in the pseudo-CT images. The prostate average (range) dose levels in pseudo-CT images with additional systematic bone segmentation errors of −2 mm, 0 mm and 2 mm were 0.5% (−0.5–1.4%), −0.2% (−1.0–0.7%), and −0.9% (−1.8–0.0%) compared to those in CT images, respectively, in volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans calculated by Monte Carlo algorithm.

Conclusions. Susceptibility-induced bone outline shift and perturbations do not result in substantial uncertainty for MRI-based dose calculation. Dose consistency of 2% can be achieved reliably for the prostate if heterogeneous pseudo-CT images are constructed with ≤± 2 mm systematic error in bone segment.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr Leonard Wee and Kevin Brown for their valuable guidance during the project. The authors thank also Seppo Kuismin for his assistance in construction of the bone phantom at the HUCH Cancer Center, and Mika Korhonen for his assistance in recording the Supplementary Video-clip 1 to be found online at http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0284186X.2014.929737. The corresponding author and the first contributing author hold a research grant from Elekta Limited with permission to publish.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.