Abstract
There are many reasons why a rigid ankle foot orthosis (AFO) may be prescribed. In some cases it is desirable that the rigidity is sufficient to maintain a constant ankle position throughout the gait cycle. There is a need to determine a design of cosmetic, lightweight AFO that provides the necessary stiffness whilst being acceptable to the patient, encouraging continued wear with the resultant benefits.
This paper describes an investigation of AFO resistance to dorsiflexion, comparing the stiffness of an AFO with forward trim lines, two designs of reinforced AFOs and an AFO with forward trim lines and an external ankle strap. One reinforced AFO had corrugations moulded in the polypropylene around the ankle, the other had carbon fibre inserts attached to the inside of the polypropylene.
The emphasis was on testing the mechanical stiffness of the four AFO designs: the test procedure did not mimic the patterns of AFO loading during gait. Each design was tested in the same manner by the same examiner.
The AFO with forward trimlines and an ankle strap displayed similar stiffness to the carbon fibre reinforced AFO and both were stiffer than the other two designs.