Evaluation of hydrophilic matrix tablets based on Carbopol^® 971P and low-viscosity sodium alginate for pH-independent controlled drug release

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate matrix tablets containing different ratios of Carbopol^® 971P (CP) to low-viscosity sodium alginate (SA) and assess their suitability for pH-independent controlled drug release. Methods: Two processing methods (physical mixing, PM and spray-drying, SD) were applied before compaction and the release from corresponding matrices was compared. The release from CP-SA PM matrices was also investigated using three model drugs (paracetamol, salicylic acid, and verapamil HCl) and two dissolution media (0.1 N HCl or phosphate buffer, pH = 6.8), and the release rate, mechanism, and pH-dependence were characterized by fitting of Higuchi and Peppas models, and evaluation of similarity factor. Furthermore, swelling behavior of CP-SA matrix tablets was studied for evaluating its impact on drug release. Results: The processing method (SD or PM) markedly affected the drug release from CP-SA matrices. ANOVA tests showed significant effects of the CP:SA ratio and drug type on the release rate (expressed by the constant, K_H, from Higuchi model) and of the dissolution medium on the release mechanism (expressed by the exponent, n, from Peppas model). Similarity factor (f₂) indicated that the CP:SA ratios ≥ 25:75 and ≥ 50:50 were suitable for pH-independent release of paracetamol and salicylic acid, respectively, although for verapamil HCl, the matrix with low CP:SA ratio (0:100) showed remarkably reduced pH-dependence of release. Swelling parameters (water uptake and mass loss) were significantly changed with experimental variables (CP:SA ratio, medium, and time) and were in good correlation with drug release. Conclusion: Matrix tablets based on CP and SA form a potentially useful versatile system for pH-independent controlled drug release.

Keywords::

• pH-independent release
• similarity factor
• spray-drying
• swelling
• erosion

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the facilities and technical assistance from staff in the AMMRF (Australian Microscopy & Microanalysis Research Facility) at the Australian Centre for Microscopy & Microanalysis, The University of Sydney.

Declaration of interest

This research work received financial support from the Research Council, Applied Science University, Amman–Jordan. The authors report no conflicts of interest.