The relation of non-invasively and invasively assessed aortic pulsatile indices to the presence and severity of coronary artery disease

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between non-invasively (NIA) and invasively assessed (IA) aortic pulsatile indices and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Subjects and Methods. The study group consisted of 58 patients who were admitted to our institute for elective coronary angiography (CAG). We measured the aortic systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure (BP) using non-invasive and invasive techniques. We assessed the pulsatile indices of the aortic pressure waveform (APW) including pulse pressure (PP), fractional PP (FPP, the ratio of PP to mean BP) and pulsatility index (PI, the ratio of PP to diastolic BP). The severity of CAD was assessed by Gensini score. Results. IA aortic PP, FPP and PI were significantly higher in patients with CAD than without CAD, but NIA indices did not show significant differences between two groups. After multivariate stepwise adjustment, the odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) of having significant CAD was: PP per 10 mmHg, OR = 2.51 (95% CI 1.12–5.63); FPP per 0.1, OR = 3.30 (95% CI 1.25–8.72); and PI per 0.1, OR = 1.88 (95% CI 1.09–3.23). In linear regression analysis, IA aortic systolic BP (SBP), PP, FPP and PI were significantly correlated with Gensini score, but NIA indices were not correlated. The NIA aortic PP was lower than IA aortic PP (mean difference: 6.1 ± 15.8 mmHg). Conclusion. IA aortic PP, FPP and PI were related to the presence and severity of CAD, but NIA assessed indices of APW were not related. NIA aortic PP underestimated IA aortic PP.

Key Words::

• Aortic pulse pressure
• central blood pressure
• coronary artery disease
• fractional pulse pressure
• pulsatility index
• radial applanation tonometry

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.