300
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Personality traits and recovery from major depressive disorder

, M.D., , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D., , M.Sc, , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D. & , M.D., Ph.D. M.A. show all
Pages 52-57 | Accepted 18 Apr 2010, Published online: 26 May 2010
 

Abstract

Objective: To study the correlation of personality traits measured by the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) with the prognosis of major depressive disorder in patients treated with either fluoxetine or short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in a randomized comparative study. Method: 35 patients with DSM IV-defined major depressive disorder of mild or moderate severity were randomized to receive either short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy or fluoxetine treatment for 16 weeks. Prior to beginning of the therapy, patients were assessed with TCI. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) was used as the outcome measure completed at the baseline and follow-up at 4 months. Results: In the combined group (n=35), Harm Avoidance was associated with the severity of the depression measured by the HDRS at the baseline (P=0.01) and baseline Self-Directedness with the HDRS at 4 months follow-up (P=0.03). In the fluoxetine treatment group, Reward Dependence (P=0.03), Self-Directedness (P=0.01) and Cooperativeness (P=0.02) at the baseline associated with HDRS at 4 months follow-up. No statistically significant associations between personality traits and depression scores at the follow-up were found in the patients treated with psychotherapy. Conclusion: In this whole cohort of depressive patients, baseline high Self-Directedness predicted higher depression scores after 4 months of treatment. In the fluoxetine treatment group, subjects with high baseline Reward Dependence, Self-Directedness or Cooperativeness were likely more severely depressed at the 4 months follow-up. We suggest that associations between personality traits and remaining depressive symptoms after 4 months treatment with fluoxetine could be caused by the potential differences in the placebo effect.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, The Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, The city of Turku and the Psychiatric Graduate School of Finland for financially supporting the study.

Declaration of interest: Dr Karlsson has received lecture fees from Bristol-Meyers-Squibb and Lundbeck. Dr Hietala has worked as a consultant to OrionPharma. Dr Markkula has received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Janssen-Cilag.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.