707
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Testing the cognitive effort hypothesis of cognitive impairment in major depression

, , , , &
Pages 74-80 | Accepted 11 May 2010, Published online: 21 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

Background: It is widely accepted that depression is associated with deficits in a range of cognitive domains. However, there is no consensus regarding the neuropsychological profile in depression. Aim: The aim of the present report is to test the cognitive effort hypothesis as a possible framework for understanding the observed cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder (MDD), using the Delis Kaplan Executive Function system (D-KEFS). Method: Twenty-four patients with recurrent MDD, in the acute phase of illness, were compared with a healthy control group. We expected that the patient group would show impairment on tests that measure higher-level effortful cognitive processing, whereas basic cognitive skills would be equal to the control group. Results: There were no differences between the two groups on measures of basic cognitive skills, except for Colour Naming. Furthermore, MDD patients performed significantly worse than the control group on three out of seven of the cognitively effortful measures; namely Inhibition, Inhibition/Switching and Category Fluency. Conclusions: We could not find consistent support for the cognitive effort hypothesis in the present study. However, the results indicate that depressed patients have a specific impairment within the Executive Function domain affecting Inhibition, Inhibition/Switching and Category Fluency.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to all participating patients and control subjects. The Research Council of Norway (NFR), Helse Vest and the University of Bergen financially supported the study. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.