180
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The DSM-IV and ICD-10 personality questionnaire (DIP-Q): Construction and preliminary validation

, , , , , & show all
Pages 285-292 | Accepted 15 Mar 1995, Published online: 12 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

This paper describes the construction and preliminary validation of a new selport inventory for personality disorders — DSM-IV and ICD-10 Personality Disorder Questionnaire (DIP-Q). In a consensus process the criteria sets of DSM-IV and ICD-10 were scrutinized. Twenty-seven criteria were judged completely identical in both systems. In addition, 20 criteria were close to identical. The total number of different criteria could thus be reduced from 161 to 114. Since 24 criteria could not be covered by a single statement, the final version of the DIP-Q includes 135 statements reflecting the criteria and additionally 5 statements reflecting the general criteria. The questionnaire is generally completed within 20 min. In the preliminary validation among 33 psychiatric patients Cronbach's alpha coefficients within each personality disorder were acceptable for most personality disorders and somewhat higher for the DSM-IV personality disorders than for those in the ICD-10. The criteria set of Dissocial disorder in the ICD-10 showed a negative alpha coefficient. When analysed dimensionally, the Pearson correlation between pairs of disorders in the ICD-10 and the DSM-IV varied from 0.77 to 0.99. Kappa coefficients between pairs from each system varied from 0.47 to 0.69. In conclusion, the ICD-10 and the DSM-IV are similar enough to enable the construction of a brief and comprehensive questionnaire evaluating personality disorders from both systems. There are, however, significant differences between systems which must be further analysed in future full-scale validation studies.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.