230
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Scheimpflug Imaging in Dermatochalasis Patients Before and After Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty

, , , , &
Pages 193-196 | Received 24 Apr 2013, Accepted 20 Aug 2013, Published online: 10 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate corneal parameters obtained by Scheimpflug imaging of dermatochalasis patients both preoperatively and after blepharoplasty. Materials and Methods: Sixty eyes of 30 patients (22 female, 8 male), which were operated upon for the upper eyelid, were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to preoperative upper margin reflex distance (MRD): MRD < 2.5 mm (Group 1) and MRD ≥ 2.5 mm (Group 2). Preoperative and postoperative (third-month) central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, steepest keratometric reading, and astigmatic power vectors were the main outcomes. Results: Postoperatively, the keratometric value of the steepest meridian increased significantly in Group 1 (p = 0.018). Preoperatively and postoperatively, J0 and J45 astigmatic power vectors were similar in each group (in Group 1, for J0 p = 0.20 and for J45 p = 0.67; in Group 2, for J0 p = 0.90 and for J45 p = 0.75). The groups were similar regarding the changes in Ksteep, in astigmatic power vector J0 naJ45 (p = 0.11, p = 0.24, p = 0.55, respectively). Conclusions: The repositioning of the upper eyelid does not lead to significant changes in visual acuity, steepest keratometric reading, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, or astigmatic power vector of J0 and J45. The only parameter that was significantly different from the preoperative value was the steepest keratometry reading in Group 1 patients. According to our results, blepharoplasty seems not to cause significant changes in the main corneal indices.

Acknowledgements

The manuscript was edited for language correction through www.editavenue.com. This study was partially presented orally at the 46th National Congress of the Turkish Ophthalmology Society in October 2012.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.