7
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Kinetics of Receptor-Mediated Uptake and Processing of Interferon-α2a and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α by Human Tumor Cells

, &
Pages 167-177 | Received 10 May 1989, Accepted 11 Aug 1989, Published online: 11 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

The kinetics of uptake and processing of recombinant human interferon-a2a (IFN) and recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF) were studied in human epithelial rumor cell lines differing in sensitivity to growth inhibition by IFN and TNF. Concentrations of [125I]IFN or [125I]TNF at the cell surface and internalized by confluent cell monolayers incubated at 37°C were measured as a function of time. Cells incubated with [125I]IFN exhibited transient maxima of surface-associated and internalized [I25I]IFN after 1-2 hr of incubation followed by a steady-state attained after approximately 6 hr of exposure to [125I]IFN. Concentration of [125I]TNF associated with the plasma membrane displayed a maximum within 20 min of incubation. Internalized radioactivity increased with time and did not achieve a steady state. We analyzed the time-dependent concentrations of membrane-associated and internalized cytokines by use of a compartmental model. This model describes changes in concentrations of free surface receptors, of ligand-receptor complex at the membrane and of internalized ligand and contains a term for receptor recycling. The rate constants for concentration changes were evaluated by fitting model functions to data. The best fits for IFN were obtained without receptor recycling. The best-fit values for the endo-cytotic rate constant (ktlFN) varied among cell lines from 2.4x10−4 to 7.8 x10−4 sec−1. To obtain fits to time-dependent concentrations of surface-associated and internalized [125I]TNF, introduction of a term for receptor recycling was required. Best-fit values for k, TNF ranged among cell lines from 8.4x10−4 to 2.5x10−3 sec−1. For every cell line, the value of klTNF was larger than the value of kclFN. We tested the significance of these differences by substituting K.IFN tor K.TNT as fixed parameters in fits to data for TNF and v.v., respectively. Under these conditions, fits were significantly worse. Our data indicate that recycling is insignificant in kinetics of Type-I IFN receptor; recycling is necessary to explain the kinetics of TNF receptor. Upon binding, TNF is taken up by cells faster than IFN and is eliminated from cells more slowly than IFN.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.