Post hoc magnetic resonance imaging cannot justify the conclusions of WHIMS

Frederick NaftolinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Jennifer KingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, USA

John H. MorrisonDepartments of Neuroscience and Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

"Post hoc magnetic resonance imaging cannot justify the conclusions of WHIMS." Gynecological Endocrinology, 26(6), pp. 391–392

Acknowledgement

To Emma Steinberg for her assistance and helpful discussions.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Post hoc magnetic resonance imaging cannot justify the conclusions of WHIMS

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Post hoc magnetic resonance imaging cannot justify the conclusions of WHIMS

Acknowledgement

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature