Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 31, 2015 - Issue 2
2,806
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Reports

Comparing core stability and traditional trunk exercise on chronic low back pain patients using three functional lumbopelvic stability tests

, PhD, PT, , PhD, PT & , PhD, PT
Pages 89-98 | Received 28 May 2013, Accepted 21 Jun 2014, Published online: 15 Oct 2014
 

Abstract

It is a matter of controversy whether core stability exercise is preferred to other types of exercise for chronic low back pain. Lumbopelvic stability is an important element in low back pain. No study was found using lumbopelvic stability tests in comparing core stability and other exercises. The single leg squat, dip test, and runner pose test appear to be suitable as tests for lumbopelvic stability. The aim of this study was to compare “core stability” and “traditional trunk exercise” using these tests and also the Oswestry disability questionnaire and pain intensity. Twenty-nine non-specific chronic low back pain subjects were alternately allocated in one of the two exercise groups. For both groups, a 16-sessions exercise program was provided. Before and after training: (1) video was recorded while subjects performed the tests; (2) Oswestry disability questionnaire was completed; and (3) pain intensity was measured by visual analogue scale. The test videos were scored by three physiotherapists. Statistical analysis revealed a significant improvement in stability test scores (p = 0.020 and p = 0.041) and reduction in disability (p < 0.001) and pain (p < 0.001) within each group. No significant difference was seen between two groups in the three outcomes p = 0.41, p = 0.14, and p = 0.72. Insignificant differences between the two groups may indicate either non-specificity of CSE to increase lumbopelvic stability or equal effectiveness of TTE and CSE on improving LPS. The non-significant differences may also be attributable to the lack of sensitivity of our tests to assess stability change in two groups after training given the relatively small sample size.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Iran University of Medical Sciences Physiotherapy, Ph.D. students, Mr. Mehdi Zamanlou, Mr. Mahmood Akbari, and Mr. Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi for their kind assistance in test video scoring; Dr. Ali Amiri and his colleagues in the Physiotherapy Department of Rasool Akram Hospital (Tehran, Iran) for their cooperation; Dr. Amir Hosein Hashemian for his statistical advice; and Dr. Bahman Mehraban for his grammatical correction on the manuscript.

Declaration of interest

The authors report that they have no conflict of interest. This work was part of a PhD project supported by the grants from Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Notice of Correction:

The title of this article has been changed since its original online publication date of October 15, 2014.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.