2,695
Views
63
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation following cancer treatment

, , , , &
Pages 2245-2258 | Received 20 Sep 2012, Accepted 05 Feb 2013, Published online: 15 Mar 2013
 

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer survivorship is increasing. However, life-saving treatments often leave people with physical, cognitive and emotional sequelae that contribute to activity and participation limitations. The purpose of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions to address problems during survivorship. Method: Best evidence synthesis. The review took as its starting point a systematic review of patient needs and supportive care interventions following cancer treatment. The study team identified the needs which could be addressed by rehabilitation and suggested others not originally included. Then they built on the earlier review’s conclusions regarding effective intervention through extraction of results from subsequent systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Results: Evidence regarding the effectiveness of potential rehabilitation interventions was reviewed for physical functioning, fatigue, pain, sexual functioning, cognitive functioning, depression, employment, nutrition and participation. With the exception of physical rehabilitation interventions following breast cancer, this literature tends to focus on psychoeducational interventions, which have demonstrated limited effectiveness for rehabilitation outcomes. Conclusions: Most of the knowledge available regarding potential rehabilitation interventions comes from psychosocial oncology literature. While there are limitations, this literature provides an excellent starting point to examine the potential effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions within cancer survivorship programs.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Good evidence exists for the use of exercise/physical rehabilitation in reducing fatigue after treatment for most cancers, and improving upper extremity functioning following treatment for breast cancer.

  • Preliminary evidence exists in a number of areas that may be improved by rehabilitation interventions, such as pain, sexual functioning, cognitive functioning and return to work, but further research is needed.

  • No intervention studies addressing participation limitations were identified. Rehabilitation professionals are encouraged to take the lead in exploring participation limitations among cancer survivors and developing suitable interventions.

Acknowledgements

Expert panel members were: Leila Amin, Katherine Berg, Aleksandra Chafranskaia, Oren Cheifetz, Barbara Collins, Janet Craik, Andrea Feldstain, Bruno Gagnon, Esther Green, Marlene Jacobson, Jennifer Jones, Geoff Liu, Margaret Liu, Rosemary Martino, Nancy Mayo, Neil McDonald, Deborah McLeod, Tricia Morrison, Maureen Parkinson, Stephanie Phan, Dan Pringle, Susan Rappolt, Ana Maria Rodriguez, Roanne Thomas and Margaret Tompson.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.