2,134
Views
47
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Paper

Assessment of spasticity after stroke using clinical measures: a systematic review

, , &
Pages 2313-2323 | Received 20 Aug 2014, Accepted 30 Jan 2015, Published online: 18 Feb 2015
 

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and appraise the literature on clinical measures of spasticity that has been investigated in people after stroke. Methods: The literature search involved four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and The Cochrane Library) up to February 2014. The selected studies included those that aimed to measure spasticity using a clinical assessment tool among adult patients post-stroke. Two independent raters reviewed the included articles using a critical appraisal scale and a structured data extraction form. Results: A total of 40 studies examining 15 spasticity assessment tools in patients post-stroke were reviewed. None of the reviewed measurement tools demonstrated satisfactory results for all psychometric properties evaluated, and the majority lacked evidence concerning validity and absolute reliability. Conclusion: This systematic review found limited evidence to support the use of most of clinical measures of spasticity for people post-stroke. Future research examining the application and psychometric properties of these measures is warranted.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • There is a need for objective clinical tools for measuring spasticity that are clinically feasible and easily interpreted by clinicians.

  • This review identified various clinical measures of spasticity that have been investigated in people after stroke.

  • Insufficient evidence of psychometric properties precludes recommending one tool over the others.

  • Future research should focus on investigating the psychometric properties of clinical measures of spasticity.

Declaration of interest

One of the co-authors (JG) of this systematic review is the first author and co-author of 2 articles included in this review. These two articles were not reviewed or rated by JG. No funding has been received for the conduct of this study.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.