390
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Neuromuscular taping versus sham therapy on muscular strength and motor performance in multiple sclerosis patients

, &
Pages 277-281 | Received 08 Aug 2014, Accepted 02 Apr 2015, Published online: 20 Apr 2015
 

Abstract

Purpose: Purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in leg muscles strength and motor performance between neuromuscular taping (NT) and sham tape groups. Method: Relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were recruited and randomly assigned to NT or sham tape groups. All patients underwent the treatment 5 times at 5-d intervals. They were submitted to a 6-minute walk test and isokinetic test (peak torque) at the beginning (T0), at the end (T1) and 2 months after the end of the treatment (T2). Results: Forty MS patients (38 F; 2 M; mean age 45.5 ± 6.5 years) were assigned to NT group (n = 20) and to sham tape group (n = 20). Delta Peak Torque T1–T0 and T2–T0 between two groups were statistically significant in quadriceps (p = 0.007; 0.000) and hamstrings (p = 0.011; 0.007). The difference between the two groups according to 6-minute walk test was not statistically significant but in NT group it was noticed an increasing trend about the distance run. Conclusions: In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, NT seemed to increase strength in leg muscles, compared to a sham device, in RR MS patients. Further studies are needed to consider this therapy as a complement to classic physical therapy.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Neuromuscular taping (NT) in multiple sclerosis:

  • NT is well tolerated by multiple sclerosis patients and should be a complement to classic physical therapy.

  • This technique normalizes muscular function, strengthens weakened muscles and assists the postural alignment.

Declaration of interest

There was no financial assistance for the project. There is no potential conflict of interest existing with respect to the authors of this article. The study gained the approval from the University of Parma Ethics Committee.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.