Abstract
Indices of activities of daily living (ADL) are commonly criticized for failing to yield other than functional information. We suggest an alternative approach in which tested functional ability (ADL competence) is distinguished from actual behaviour (ADL performance). A method of making these assessments, based on the Australian ADL Index, was trialled in a longitudinal study involving 130 patients admitted for rehabilitation following stroke. Twelve months after discharge from rehabilitation the total ADL performance score was higher, that is to say worse, than the total ADL competence score; further, there was no significant agreement between the competence and performance ratings for nine of the 17 activities. It appears that ADL competence and ADL performance can be distinguished both theoretically and empirically. Two case studies illustrate the usefulness of the performance assessment. We recommend the ADL performance assessment as an outcome measure in rehabilitation.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Michael S. Clark
It is with great sadness that we have to inform the readership of the Journal that shortly after completing the final editorial work on this Special Issue, Professor Kalman Jacob Mann was seriously injured in a car accident and subsequently died.
Professor Mann was responsible for establishing the two Hadassah Hospitals and Community Health Centres in Jerusalem and for the past 20 years headed the Presidium of Yad Sarah, Israel's largest community based, volunteer operated organization which provides a spectrum of free or nominal cost home care services nation-wide.
We offer our condolences to his family and friends, and trust that this Special Issue stands as a testament to his work in the field.