Abstract
The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) is a well-established laboratory stressor leading to a robust activation of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. Existing control conditions are often not adequate to investigate participants' behavior during the situation as participants are often left alone in the room. This present study aimed to evaluate a friendly version of the TSST as control condition, the friendly-TSST (f-TSST). We expected that the f-TSST would not activate the HPA axis or increase the negative affect (NA). Forty-eight healthy male and female students (24 males) aged between 18 and 30 years were randomly exposed to either the TSST or the f-TSST. The latter features a similar structure and similar cognitive demands as in the TSST, and a social interaction with a committee. The main difference lies in the friendly and warm behavior of the committee opposed to the neutral and reserved behavior in the TSST, typically inducing social-evaluative threat. Salivary cortisol, salivary α-amylase (sAA), and affect were measured to evaluate the stress response to the respective procedure. As expected, the f-TSST neither activated the HPA axis nor increased the NA. The TSST by contrast led to an increase in both measures. A comparable and significant increase in the sAA-concentrations occurred in both conditions. The f-TSST could be useful as a standardized control condition for future stress studies. On a conceptual level our data indicate that mere social performance in the absence of social-evaluative threat and performance pressure does not activate the HPA axis.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Tanja Hamacher-Dang for helping with data collection and to Eve-Mariek Hessas for language editing. Furthermore, they thank Stephan Pabst, Anja Cui, Eve-Mariek Hessas, Igor Ivanov, Martin Hoffmann, Mathias Hauschild, Matthias Pillny, Nicole Raddatz, Niklas Trimborn, and Patrick Friedrich for their help as TSST/f-TSST committee members.
Declaration of interest : This study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) project B4 of Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 874 “Integration and Representation of Sensory Processes” and the project P5 (WO 733/13-1) of the DFG Research Unit 1581 “Extinction Learning: Neural Mechanisms, Behavioural Manifestations, and Clinical Implications”. The DFG had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.