Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during worry forecasts stress-related increases in psychological distress

Abstract

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) has been conceptualized as an index of emotion regulation abilities. Although resting RSA has been associated with both concurrent and prospective affective responses to stress, the impact of RSA reactivity on emotional responses to stress is inconsistent across studies. The type of emotional stimuli used to elicit these phasic RSA responses may influence the adaptive value of RSA reactivity. We propose that RSA reactivity to a personally relevant worry-based stressor might forecast future affective responses to stress. To evaluate whether resting RSA and RSA reactivity to worry inductions predict stress-related increases in psychological distress, an academic stress model was used to prospectively examine changes in psychological distress from the well-defined low- and high-stress periods. During the low-stress period, 76 participants completed self-report mood measures and had their RSA assessed during a resting baseline, free worry period and worry catastrophizing interview. Participants completed another mood assessment during the high-stress period. Results indicated that baseline psychological distress predicted larger decreases in RSA during the worry inductions. Lower resting RSA and greater RSA suppression to the worry inductions at baseline prospectively predicted larger increases in psychological distress from the low- to high-stress period, even after accounting for the impact of baseline distress on RSA. These results provide further evidence that RSA may represent a unique index of emotion regulation abilities in times of stress.

• Academic stress
• autonomic function
• emotion regulation
• heart rate variability
• RSA
• worry catastrophizing

Acknowledgements

We thank Karine Aubé, Sarah El Nabulsi, Krista Pratte, Jessica Tutino and Kerstin Wenzel for their help with conducting the study.

Notes

¹When the analyses were repeated using the full length of the worry catastrophizing interview, the results were not significantly different from those obtained using the first 2 min of the task. Therefore, only the results obtained when using the first two minutes of the worry catastrophizing interview are presented in the manuscript.