1,019
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Evaluation of take home (para-occupational) exposure to asbestos and disease: a review of the literature

, , , &
Pages 703-731 | Received 20 Jan 2012, Accepted 04 Jul 2012, Published online: 22 Aug 2012
 

Abstract

The potential for para-occupational (or “take-home”) exposure to a number of chemicals has been recognized for over 60 years. We conducted a literature review in order to characterize reported cases of asbestos-related disease among household contacts of workers occupationally exposed to asbestos. Over 200 published articles were evaluated. Nearly 60 articles described cases of asbestos-related disease thought to be caused by para-occupational exposure. Over 65% of these cases were in persons who lived with workers classified as miners, shipyard workers, insulators, or others involved in the manufacturing of asbestos-containing products, with nearly all remaining workers identified as craftsmen. 98% of the available lung samples of the persons with diseases indicated the presence of amphibole asbestos. Eight studies provided airborne asbestos concentrations during (i) handling of clothing contaminated with asbestos during insulation work or simulated use of friction products; (ii) ambient conditions in the homes of asbestos miners; and (iii) wearing previously contaminated clothing. This review indicates that the literature is dominated by case reports, the majority of which involved household contacts of workers in industries characterized, generally, by high exposures to amphiboles or mixed mineral types. The available data do not implicate chrysotile as a significant cause of disease for household contacts. Also, our analysis indicates that there is insufficient information in the published literature that would allow one to relate airborne asbestos concentrations in a workplace to those that would be generated from subsequent handling of contact with clothing that had been contaminated in that environment. Ideally, a simulation study could be conducted in the future to better understand the relationships between the airborne concentrations in the workplace and the fiber characteristics that influence retention on fabric, as well as the concentrations that can be generated by handling the contaminated clothing by the persons in the home.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Tyler Ferracini for his assistance reviewing documents from the Johns-Manville Trust and William Cyrs for his help with reviewing the particle literature.

Declaration of interest

The gathering of articles that were read and analyzed was associated with work done to prepare other published papers or for assembling information to be presented in courtrooms, an effort that was supported by a number of companies that have been, and are, involved in asbestos-related litigation. No organization asked the authors to write this paper, and funding for doing so was provided by the authors’ employer, ChemRisk, L.L.C. One of the authors (D.J.P.) has served as an expert in asbestos litigation; including claims regarding para-occupational exposure.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.