20
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

High Dose Chemotherapy Without Hematopoietic Cell Support for the Treatment of Refractory Lymphoma

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 497-502 | Received 16 Dec 1998, Published online: 01 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Conventional dose combination chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma is rarely curative. High dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant (HPCT) has a clearly defined role in patients who have first relapsed after standard CHOP chemotherapy for lymphoma. However, the role of HPCT is less well defined for patients with chemo-resistant, or chemo-refractory disease. Sixteen patients (15 Non-Hodgkin's, 1 Hodgkin's Disease) were entered into a phase II study to determine if a dose intensive induction regimen in heavily pre-treated refractory lymphoma patients could permit further consolidation with HPCT. The primary endpoints were survival, response, tox-icity, and resource utilization. The regimen consisted of continuous infusion etoposide I or 2 gm/m2/72 hours, idarubicin 12mg/m2/d for 3 days followed by cytarabine 2gm/m2/72 hours on days 8,9, and 10 (VIC). Fifteen patients were evaluable for objective response. The overall response rate was 53% with 7 patients achieving a partial response and 1 patient achieving a complete response. Of the 8 responders, 6 patients subsequently received high dose chemotherapy followed by HPCT (4 autologous, 2 allogeneic). The median survival was 176 days for the non-responders contrasted with 722 days for the responders. The average duration of hospitalization was 38 days. Toxicity was mainfest primarily as mucositis with a median grade of 3 among the first 13 patients, and a median grade of 2 in three subsequent patients who received an etoposide dose of lgm/m2/72 hours. All patients had an episode of neutro-penic fever and 5 patients developed clinically significant pneumonitis during therapy.

The VIC regimen is active in the treatment of chemo-refractory lymphoma with clinically significant differences in survival for patients who respond to therapy. Further modifications to the regimen could include the addition of a topoisomerase I inhibitor for synergy with etoposide, and using VIC as part of a tandem transplant regimen where response to VIC would allow further therapy with a myeloablative induction followed by HPCT.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.